FHFarmHive DSSResearch prototype

FARM INSTANCE + FETA / INTERACTIVE DEMO

The plan is a benchmark.
The season tells its own story.

A fictional watermelon field illustrates how activities and unexpected events can be compared. Every date, actual cost, reason and outcome in this season is synthetic.

Demo Farm · Field A · 2026

10 dunums · Rainfed · Protocol P10R-001

The recommended dates below are illustrative benchmark dates, not dates recovered from the source. Operation names follow source categories. Activity costs are invented examples and do not sum to the complete worksheet budget.

Illustrative recommended-versus-actual activity records · costs for the 10-dunum field
ActivityBenchmark dateActual dateDeviationBenchmark / actual costReason & recorded outcome

UNEXPECTED EVENT / E-001

Poor emergence observed

25 March 2026 · Synthetic observation

A farmer reports an uneven stand. The response is an additional field inspection; the reason recorded is to understand the extent before deciding on further action.

Extra cost: ₪100 for the field.
Advice context: no external advice recorded.
Follow-up, 1 April: unevenness persists; no additional intervention recorded.

This records a decision and follow-up. It does not establish cause, treatment effectiveness or an agronomic recommendation.

SEASON OUTCOME / SYNTHETIC

From decisions to measurable results

Benchmark seed output
350 kg
Illustrative actual output
320 kg (−8.6%)
Benchmark / actual sale price
₪13.50 / kg
Benchmark / actual revenue
₪4,725 / ₪4,320
Illustrative actual growing cost
₪3,600
Illustrative actual contribution
₪720

Benchmark output and revenue scale the source model by 10 dunums. Actual cost includes the event response. Actual contribution = revenue − growing cost, assuming zero additional capital recovery. No causal link is inferred between the recorded event and output.

What a standardized research record retains

Protocol ID and version; farm, field and season IDs; area and units; activity or event ID; planned and actual dates; resources and costs; hazard observation; response and reason; advice source; follow-up and outcome; evidence and review status.

This public demo has no real farmer records, login or data submission. A live research system would need participant consent, privacy controls and quality review.